TMAP Monitoring Handbook

Birds - Breeding success

1 Introduction

This guideline is not included in the "Common Package of TMAP parameters” as defined in Annex 2 of the Stade Declaration. A two-year pilot project "Breeding success” was carried out in 1996/97 to develop a harmonized trilateral program and test the already designed methods (Thyen et al. 1998). Preliminary guidelines for breeding success in the framework of the TMAP were developed by an expert group under the JMBB and published in 1996 (Exo et al. 1996).

The proposed parameters “breeding success” is a suitable parameter and should be included in the TMAP. It is the most important indicator to assess the state of a bird population, acts as an “early warning signal” and complements the other bird monitoring parameters. The additional costs depend on the number of monitoring sites and species; in 2001 it was estimated to about 6350 Euro per site (TMAP Evaluation Report 2001), this figure, however, has to be updated to the recent situation. The financial implications have to be assessed at a later stage.

2 Objectives

The monitoring of breeding success is carried out to detect and assess

  • the response of these species to changes in pollution levels which may affect the abundance and physiological functions of species leading to structural changes in the ecosystem,
  • the effects of recreational activities on the occurrence and abundance of species (including population size, growth and reproduction of species).

3 Monitoring requirements

Wadden Sea Plan (WSP)

Targets on “Birds”

Favorable conditions for migratory and breeding birds

  • favorable food availability,
  • natural breeding success,
  • sufficiently large undisturbed roosting and moulting areas,
  • natural flight distances.

EC Birds Directive (BD)

BD

Article 2: Measure to maintain the bird populatio
Article 3: Measure to preserve, maintain or reestablish a sufficient diversity and area of habitats
Article 4: Special conservation measures for Annex I species and for regularly occurring migratory species not listed in Annex I.
Article 10: Research as basis for protection, management

Annex I List of species
Annex V: List of endangered species, important areas, data on population level, taking of wild birds, species as indicators of pollution, effects of chemical pollution.

EC Habitats Directive (HD)

HD

Birds are characteristic species of marine habitat types and are part of HD monitoring and reporting scheme

Water framework directive (WFD)

WFD

Not relevant.

Oslo Paris convention (OSPAR)

Biological Diversity and Ecosystems Strategy, Annex V and Appendix 3

Ecological Quality Objectives (EcoQO) Issue 3:
3.1 Proportion of oiled guillemots among those found dead or dying on beaches.
3.2 Mercury concentrations in seabird eggs.
3.3 Organohalogen concentrations in seabird eggs
3.4 Plastic particle in stomachs of seabirds
3.5 Local sand eel availability to black-legged kittiwakes (breeding success in various UK regions)
3.6 Seabird population trends as an index of seabird community health.

EcoQO Issue 7:
“threatened and/or declining species”: presence and extent of species in the North Sea as shown on the Initial OSPAR List.

Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar)

Ramsar

„Monitoring and analysis of the ecological character of the site and for assessing the status and trends of wetlands … of […], flora and fauna, […], conservation measures and potential threats.”

African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement (AEWA)

AEWA

Regional Agreement under the Bonn Convention.

Annex 3 Action Plan:
Article 5:
“endeavour to monitor the populations listed in Table 1. The results … shall be published or sent to appropriate international organizations, to enable reviews of population status and trends.

  • … cooperate with a view to determining the migration routes of all populations listed in Table 1, using available knowledge of breeding and non-breeding season distributions and census results, and by participating in coordinated ringing programmes.”

4 Definitions

5 TMAP Monitoring Strategy

The first draft of the guideline has been presented and discussed at the extra JMBB meeting in Wilhelmshaven on August 29, 2007. Different options of implementation (scientific validity versus different budgets) including a baseline scenario with a minimum of sample sites, parameters and species has been discussed and agreed at the JMBB 07/2 meeting on October 31, 2007.

(Table 5.1) Parameters with monitoring locations and frequencies and the relation to the other monitoring requirements.

Parameters Description Location Frequency Method WFD BD/HD OSPAR OTHER Remark
Mandatory TMAP parameters                  
Hatching success (birds)   2-4 sites per region Annually (between April - July) According TMAP pilot project - X - X 15 regions in total
Reproductive success (birds)   2-4 sites per region Annually (between April - July) According TMAP pilot project - X - X 15 regions in total

Remarks:

5.1 Parameters

For the monitoring of breeding success, a well-established set of parameters is available (Exo et al. 1996, Thyen et al. 1998, Willems et al. 2005):

  • Onset of laying
  • Clutch size
  • Hatching success
  • Growth of chicks (as indicator for condition)
  • Survival of chicks (fledging success)
  • Reproductive success (final breeding success)

For practical reasons, not all parameters are relevant for all species. Some species can only be monitored during the nest-period, others only during the chick-rearing period (also with respect to disturbance, e.g. no visits to spoonbill-colonies during incubation because this species is easily disturbed). Table 5.2 lists all potential species ('high priority species', see Tab. 1.2.10) and relevant parameters for each species.

(Table 5.2) Species and parameters to be monitored in a TMAP monitoring scheme for breeding success in the Wadden Sea. x possible, - not possible or not recommended because of disturbance.

Species hatching success clutch size onset laying reproductive success growth chicks survival chicks
Eurasian Spoonbill - - - x - -
Common Eider - - - x - -
Oystercatcher x x x x - x
Avocet x x x x - x
Black-headed Gull x x x x x x
L. Black-backed Gull x x x x x x
Herring Gull x x x x x x
Sandwich Tern x x x x x x
Common Tern x x x x x x
Arctic Tern x x x x x x
Priority high high high high medium medium

5.2 Monitoring locations

  • selected census areas: at least two areas in each sub-region (four areas for Oystercatcher and Redshank). Disturbances should be reduced to a minimum.

6 Methods

According to Final Report of the Pilot Study 1996 - 1997 (Thyen et al. 1998). A methodical guideline has to be written for using on a national level in respect to different bird species and monitoring sites.

7 Parameter

Mandatory TMAP Parameters (covering entire intertidal area):

  • Hatching success (birds)
  • Reproductive success (birds)

8 Frequency and time

Annually monitoring during breeding season between April and July.

For details see [Table 5.1].

9 Assessment

The aims of a monitoring scheme for breeding success in the trilateral Wadden Sea have already been listed by Exo et al. (1996) and Thyen et al. (1998) and are still valid. Moreover, assessment of the conservation status of birds, as requested by the EU-Bird Directive, has been added since a favourable conservation status has become the guiding principle for management of bird populations in the Wadden Sea.

  • Evaluate favourable conservation status requested by the EU Bird Directive;
  • Evaluate the target 'natural breeding success' in the Wadden Sea Plan (1997);
  • Provide an 'early-warning' system to detect changes in the Wadden Sea ecosystem;
  • Explain observed trends in breeding bird numbers.

In addition, a monitoring scheme for breeding success is beneficial to the assessment of the existing parameter 'contaminants in bird eggs' (there is a more direct link between contaminants and breeding performance than between contaminants and trends, Becker et al. 1998). Besides, it provides the necessary input for an Integrated Population Monitoring of breeding birds in the Wadden Sea.

10 Reporting

An annual report on breeding success will be included in the regular 'highlight' reports in the Wadden Sea Newsletter and annual presentation of monitoring results on the internet (as is done for trends in migratory and breeding birds at the website of CWSS). Comprehensive data analyses will be included in the report on the total count (with 6 year-interval, next on the total count in 2012).

All data obtained from aerial and field surveys should be transferred to a geographical information system (GIS) for the analysis and assessment of the data (spatial and temporal development) and in combination with other GIS based information.

11 Quality assurance

Appropriate monitoring protocols should be developed on national level. Intercalibration exercises should be carried out nationally and in the framework of the TMAP.

[to be included: reference to existing QA procedures and SOP]

12 Monitoring authorities

Germany

Landesbetrieb für Küstenschutz, Nationalpark und Meeresschutz (LKN)

Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer (NLPV)

Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz (NLWKN)

Denmark

Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser (DMU, NERI)

Netherlands

SOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland

13 Literature

Becker, P., S. Thyen, S. Mickstein & U. Sommer. 1998.: Monitoring pollutants in coastal bird eggs in the Wadden Sea: final report of the pilot study 1996-97. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 8. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven.

Beintema, A.J. 1992.: Mayfield moet: oefeningen in het berekenen van uitkomstsucces. Limosa 65: 155-162.

Essink, K., C. Dettmann, H. Farke, K. Laursen, G. Lüerßen, H. Marencic & W. Wiersinga (Eds.) 2005.: Wadden Sea Quality Status Report 2004 Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 19.

Exo, K-M., P.H. Becker, B. Hälterlein, H. Hötker, H. Scheufler, A. Stiefel, M. Stock, P. Südbeck & O. Thorup. 1996.: Bruterfolgsmonitoring bei Küstenvögeln. Die Vogelwelt 117: 287-293.

Fleet, D. M., J. Frikke, P. Südbeck & R.L. Vogel. 1994.: Breeding Birds in the Wadden Sea 1991. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No.1.

Greenwood, J.J.D., S.R. Baillie, H.Q.P. Crick, J.H. Marchant & W.J. Peach. 1993.: Integrated Population Monitoring detecting the effects of diverse changes. In: R.W. Furness & J.J.D. Greenwood (eds), Birds as monitors of environmental change.: 267-342. Chapman & Hall, London.

Hötker, H. & A. Segebade. 2000.: Effects of predation and weather on the breeding success of Avocets Recurvirostra avosetta. Bird Study 47: 91-101.

Jong, F. de, J.F. Bakker, C.J.M. van Berkel, N.M.J.A. Dankers, K. Dahl, C. Gätje, H. Marencic & P. Potel. 1999.: Wadden Sea Quality status report. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 9, Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group, Quality Status Report Group. Wilhelmshaven, Germany.

Koffijberg, K. 2008.: Implementation of 'breeding success' as new parameter within TMAP. Report to the JMMB. TMAG 08/1/6.1-3.

Koffijberg, K., L. Dijksen, B. Hälterlein, K. Laursen, P. Potel & P. Südbeck. 2005.: Breeding birds in the Wadden Sea in 2001. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 22. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.

Melter, J., P. Südbeck, D. M. Fleet, L. M. Rasmussen & R. L. Vogel. 1997.: Changes in breeding bird numbers in census areas in the Wadden Sea 1990 until 1994. Wadden Sea Eco-system No. 4. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven.

Rasmussen, L.-M., D.M. Fleet, B. Hälterlein, B.J. Koks, P. Potel & P. Südbeck. 2000.: Breeding birds in the Wadden Sea in 1996. Wadden Sea Ecosystem No. 10. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven.

Reneerkens, J., T. Piersma & B. Spaans. 2005.: De Waddenzee als kruispunt van vogeltrekwegen. NIOZ-rapport 2005-4. NIOZ, Den Burg.

Thomas, L., S.T. Buckland, K.B. Newman & J. Harwood. 2005.: A unified framework for modelling wildlife population dynamics. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 47: 19-34.

Thyen, S., P.H. Becker, K-M. Exo, B. Hälterlein, H. Hötker & P. Südbeck. 1998.: Monitoring breeding success of coastal birds. Final report of the pilot studies 1996-1997. Wadden Sea Ecosystem Ecosystem No. 8. Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Wilhelmshaven.

Willems, F., R. Oosterhuis, L. Dijksen, R.K.H. Kats & B. J. Ens. 2005.: Broedsucces van kustbroedvogels in de Waddenzee 2005. Sovon-onderzoeksrapport 2005/07. SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen.