|
| |
|
WSNL 1997-1
|
|
H. Manzenrieder & M. Schulze
|
|
Erosion Stability of Dike Foreshores
|
|
|
|
Helmut Manzenrieder, Oldenburg & Michael Schulze,
Braunschweig, FRG
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
The forelying area in front of the dike provides a direct
contribution to the safety of dikes under storm surge loads
depending on their width and height. The area is
traditionally used as pasture. To fulfill the objectives for
protection within the "Nationalpark - Niedersächsisches
Wattenmeer" efforts are being made to allow the "Heller" to
develop as naturally as possible without intervention and
therefore to limit structured drainage as well as its use as
pasture.
Between the years 1987 and 1994, an interdisciplinary
research project was carried out on the East Frisian coast
to examine the effect of pasture intensity and structured
drainage on the stability of the "Heller". The examinations
with different flow loads on the "Heller" surface
consistently showed that pronounced erosion of the developed
"Heller" by overflowing can be practically excluded, even
under extreme flow conditions.
|
|
This statement is valid independent of its use as pasture
or if there is structured drainage. The weak spot of the
"Heller" is its edge, which is a step-like transition
between the foreshore and the mudflats. The existing
potential for destruction is found less in the seldom
occurring, spectacular storm surges but more in the edge
flows which occur often and are completely insignificant, as
far as the safety of the dike is concerned. In conjunction
with this, there are also slight changes of mean water
levels which are of small importance to immediate dike
safety but should be monitored carefully because of their
effect on the stability of the foreshore.
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The foreshore of a dike is of great importance for the
loading capacity and stability of the dike behind. Depending
on the water level, a considerable part of the sea energy is
converted through waves breaking over the surface of the
foreshore in front of the dike line (Fig. 1). A dike
foreshore is called "Heller" in East Frisia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 1. The effect of a high and low foreshore on
wave loads.
|
|
The utilization and management of the "Heller", which has
been practiced for generations (Brahms 1774), has recently
come under increasing discussion. In connection with the
development of the "Nationalpark - Niedersächsisches
Wattenmeer" in 1986, a new goal is to minimize or completely
eliminate intervention in this environment.
Important questions about the safety of the dikes are the
stability of the foreshore regarding the influence of
extensive use as pasture and a change in drainage with
changes to flora and fauna as well as the soil structure. To
investigate these questions and work out objective
evaluation criteria, a research project called -The Erosion
Stability of "Hellers"- sponsored by the Federal Ministry of
Research and Technology (BMFT) and the Committee for
Research in Coastal Engineering (KFKI) was jointly executed
from 1987 to 1994 by the following special government
departments and universities:
- State Office for Island and Coast Protection, Norden;
- Lower Saxony State Office for Ecology, Coast Research
Station, Norderney;
- Institute of Applied Botanics, University of
Münster;
- Institute of Soil Science, University of Oldenburg;
- Leichtweiß-Institute of Hydraulic Engineering,
TU Braunschweig.
|
|
The research project's assignment was to examine the
stability of the "Heller", taking into consideration how
intensive the foreshore is used for pasture and structured
drainage and, from here, to develop objective, practical
evaluation criteria or recommendations for future use or for
managing it.
As a subproject within the scope of the research project,
the Leichtweiß-Institute had the assignment of trying
to simulate the load on the surface of the "Heller" as close
as possible and to quantitatively examine the effects of the
different types of utilization on the stability of the
"Heller". Tailored to these questions, a sea water test
canal was used as a central experiment facility and located
directly on the East Frisian coast. Undisturbed large scale
samples taken from the "Heller" areas were tested in this
canal in long-time tests and the stability of the soil
monoliths was studied under controlled flows corresponding
to conditions during a storm surge.
The following three "Heller" areas with different soil
structure, vegetation, use as pasture, etc. were selected
within the "Nationalpark - Niedersächsisches
Wattenmeer" (Fig. 2):
- "Leybucht" hedged test grounds
- "Buscherheller"
- "Neßmerheller"
|
|
|
|
Fig. 2. The position of the study areas and the
sea water tank (test canal).
|
|
WSNL 1997-1
|
|
H. Manzenrieder & M. Schulze
|
|
SEA WATER TEST CANAL
The objective of the sea water test canal study was to
simulate the collected values of the "Heller's" flow load in
a model test under defined conditions. The test canal allows
examinations of approx. 500 kg soil monoliths on a scale of
1:1. Using sea water, the grass-covered surface was approx.
2 m2. After creating the natural hydraulic, biological and
soil mechanical conditions during continuous flooding, the
resulting erosion stability of the selected soil samples,
also under the influence of agricultural use, which can be
isolated, was determined (see Fig. 3).
|
|
Measurements taken in the immediate vicinity of the edge
of the "Heller" show that when the "Heller" edge is
overflowed, especially when the water level rises, peak
values in flow velocity of up to approx. 5 m/s can occur.
The test conditions lie above the constant values measured
on site or the load to be expected, especially in regard to
the duration of the test.
|
|
|
|
Fig. 3. Sea water test canal with a view of the
pump station and the storage basin.
|
|
WSNL 1997-1
|
|
H. Manzenrieder & M. Schulze
|
|
FLOW LOADS
The results at hand from different studies in the past,
showed the great influence of biogenic components on flow
behavior and stability of soils. Throughout, the
examinations showed that an erosion of the "Heller" soils
through energy-rich, stationary overflow, or overflow pulsed
through variable degrees of obstruction, can be practically
excluded. This also applies to corresponding examinations on
soil samples with disturbed surfaces (so called "salt pans")
or artificially weakened surfaces through deliberate
reduction of growth, dystrophication and damage.
Roots, and biologically active, but also dead plant
material that is enclosed in layers have a decisive
erosion-retarding effect. The development of soil on the
"Heller", i.e. the beginning of a granular structure in the
upper soil, is connected with a biogenic stabilization of
the sediments which in the initial phase are brought in
layer-wise. This natural process leads to an increase in
stability of the "Heller". Decreasing the intensity of use
as pasture does not necessarily lead to a loss of stability
in spite of lower soil compaction.
When comparing the differently managed locations on the
testing grounds of the Leybucht, soil samples from the area
with extensive use as pasture close to the dike showed the
highest stability.
|
|
When there is no soil development, local disturbances
caused by washout were observed, especially on the surface
of samples from lower lying areas of the testing ground not
used for pasture. The alternating deposits consisting of
sediment (silt) and the remains of plants or the former
"Heller" layers that are found in the soil at these
locations showed less adhesion of the layers. Because of
this, this soil reacted relatively more sensitively to the
flow load. On the other hand, comparable areas with
structured drainage showed higher erosion stability.
Mixed movements, induced by the above ground part of
plants, lead to turbulence which in turn, leads to a
reduction of the flow velocity over the "Heller" surface. An
optimal shield is achieved by growth that is as high and
elastic as possible but not to the point that plant density
is reduced. These prerequisites are achieved on the Leybucht
testing ground with 0.5 to 1 cattle per ha on pasture, but
also on parcels of land on the "Neßmerheller" not used
for pasture. The lower growth on the areas used for pasture
in a normal intensity have a lesser shielding effect and, in
conjunction, there is a higher flow load on the soil
surface.
In conclusion, it should be pointed out again that here
none of the samples showed substantial, sustained
disintegration of the soil structure.
|
|
WSNL 1997-1
|
|
H. Manzenrieder & M. Schulze
|
|
WAVE LOADS ON THE EDGES OF THE "HELLER"
The transition from mudflat to "Heller" does not run
continuously over wide sections of the East and North
Frisian coast as it does, for example, in the Leybucht or
Dollart but has rather a pronounced eroding bank.
As measurements in the natural environment quantitatively
demonstrated, the load on these edges is clearly less during
singular, high or extreme storm surges than during regular
or slightly higher water levels which occur often. The load
on these sensitive foreshore flanks and the break-up in
connection with it, is caused by the effect of waves during
water levels and swell effects that are completely
meaningless, as far as dike safety is concerned. The load
that occurs in edge flows is the result of increased flow
caused by breaking waves and their immediate, short term
pressure peak effects that are also designated as so called
pressure surges.
The studies on the load of "Heller" edges were carried
out in a wave canal at the Leichtweiß-Institute. The
technically complicated tests for measuring were carried out
both on an artificial edge made of concrete and on soil
monoliths with natural edges.
The studies in the wave canal have shown that the
"Heller's" edge is substantially endangered when there is a
wave load. The wave load acts as a point or linear load on
the "Heller" edge and the local geometric structure has a
great influence on the resulting pressure and dynamic
effect.
The heaviest loads from pressure surge and surge flow
occurred in the examinations when incoming waves broke
immediately in front of the edge and the crest of the
breaker hit the edge directly (load type B).
|
|
The biogenic composite effect promotes the disintegration
behavior of the soil sample in phases. Fig. 4 shows
such a pressure surge load from swells on a "Heller" edge in
the form of a schematic presentation.
All other types of loads, i.e. with the breaking point in
front of the edge on the forelying mudflat (load type A) or
on the foreshore surface (load type C) show a considerably
lower pressure surge load and, in connection with this, a
higher structure stability (Tab. 1).
Pressure peaks of up to approx. 1.8 bar were measured as
individual values for B type loads, this corresponds to 70
times the value of initial wave height.
In connection with the strong, upward directed,
transporting flow components, the disintegrating pressure
surges acting in these hollow spaces caused the soil to be
broken open towards the top where it was carried away
together with the grass cover. After the grass cover was
permanently damaged, nearly the complete height of the
sample was washed out. As a result, it can be stated that
the destruction of such "Heller" edges is not continuous but
rather runs in individual phases depending on the internal
structure of the grain fiber work and the alternating
layers. The more cohesive soil of the "Buscherheller" showed
a comparably high stability in the wave tests.
|
|
Tab. 1. Mean values of all pressure surge peaks as
well as surge velocities on an artificial "Heller" edge
under typical small wind waves (heights approx. 25 cm).
|
|
Load type
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
|
Pressure surge p max
|
-
|
0.4 bar
|
0.2 bar
|
|
Surge velocity v max
|
2.5 m/s
|
3.3 m/s
|
3.0 m/s
|
|
|
|
Fig. 4.Schematic presentation of the pressure
surge load from swells on a "Heller" edge.
|
|
WSNL 1997-1
|
|
H. Manzenrieder & M. Schulze
|
|
REFERENCES
Brahms, A., 1774: Anfangs-Gründe der
Deich- und Wasserbaukunst, Teil 1, p. 200ff.
Coldewey, H.-G.; Erchinger, H. F., 1992:
Deichvorland: Seine Entwicklung zwischen Ems und Jade und
die Forschungsvorhaben "Erosionsfestigkeit von Hellern", Die
Küste, Heft 54, pp. 167-187.
Führböter, A., et al., 1976:
Äußere Belastung von Seedeichen. In: Seedeichbau,
Theorie und Praxis, Vereinigung von
Naßbaggerunternehmen e. V., Hamburg, pp. 5-79.
Schulze, M.; Manzenrieder, H., 1994:
Erosionsfestigkeit von Deichvorländern, Untersuchungen
im Seewasserversuchskanal Neßmersiel. Mitteilung. des
Leichtweiß-Inst. der TU Braunschweig, Heft 132, pp.
141-171.
|
|
Authors addresses:
H. M.
Ingenieurbüro Dr. Manzenrieder & Partner
Brookweg 29
D - 26127 Oldenburg
M. S.
Ing.gesellschaft Dr.-Ing. E. Macke mbH
Am Hafen 22
D - 38112 Braunschweig
|
Back to Contents
|